Re: [avr-libc-dev] Should cli() imply a memory barrier?

[Joerg Wunsch]

As Paulo Marques wrote:

> One thing we could do for the programmers that want to use the "raw"
> cli version and know what they are doing is to keep a "__cli" or
> "__raw_cli" version (or some other name) that just emits a single
> "cli" instruction.

I guess it's simple enough then to just write

asm volatile("cli");

-- 
cheers, J"org               .-.-.   --... ...--   -.. .  DL8DTL

http://www.sax.de/~joerg/                        NIC: JW11-RIPE
Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)