[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [avr-libc-dev] Re: [bug #25300] Additional i/o port names
From: |
Weddington, Eric |
Subject: |
RE: [avr-libc-dev] Re: [bug #25300] Additional i/o port names |
Date: |
Thu, 2 Apr 2009 08:10:44 -0600 |
> -----Original Message-----
> From:
> address@hidden
> [mailto:address@hidden
> org] On Behalf Of Bob Paddock
> Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2009 5:49 AM
> To: address@hidden
> Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] Re: [bug #25300] Additional i/o port names
>
> >we need to generate a list of what was wrong with the XML
> files to give to Atmel.
>
> Putting the fuse enumerations, actually in the fuse section
> would make sense,
> they don't do that now.
Could you be more specific? And send it to the official Atmel address? ;-)
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] Re: [bug #25300] Additional i/o port names, (continued)
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] Re: [bug #25300] Additional i/o port names, Weddington, Eric, 2009/04/07
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Re: [bug #25300] Additional i/o port names, Frédéric Nadeau, 2009/04/10
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] Re: [bug #25300] Additional i/o port names, Weddington, Eric, 2009/04/12
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Re: [bug #25300] Additional i/o port names, Bob Paddock, 2009/04/12
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] Re: [bug #25300] Additional i/o port names, Weddington, Eric, 2009/04/12
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Re: [bug #25300] Additional i/o port names, Frédéric Nadeau, 2009/04/12
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] Re: [bug #25300] Additional i/o port names, Weddington, Eric, 2009/04/12
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Re: [bug #25300] Additional i/o port names, Frédéric Nadeau, 2009/04/14
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] Re: [bug #25300] Additional i/o port names, Weddington, Eric, 2009/04/14
Re: [avr-libc-dev] Re: [bug #25300] Additional i/o port names, Bob Paddock, 2009/04/02
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] Re: [bug #25300] Additional i/o port names,
Weddington, Eric <=