[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [avr-libc-dev] compiler support of new devices
From: |
Weddington, Eric |
Subject: |
RE: [avr-libc-dev] compiler support of new devices |
Date: |
Sun, 16 Nov 2008 08:03:22 -0700 |
> -----Original Message-----
> From:
> address@hidden
> [mailto:address@hidden
> org] On Behalf Of Weddington, Eric
> Sent: Sunday, November 16, 2008 7:52 AM
> To: Joerg Wunsch; address@hidden
> Subject: RE: [avr-libc-dev] compiler support of new devices
>
>
>
> > As Weddington, Eric wrote:
> >
> > > > atmega128a atmega168pa atmega16a atmega324pa atmega32a
> atmega32u6
> > > > atmega64a atmega88pa atmega8a attiny13a
> >
> > > Many of those devices you listed have not been formally released
> > > yet, so support has not been added.
> >
> > The question is whether we really want to do anything for
> them (except
> > for the ATmega32U6, of course). As far as I understand, all the "A"
> > parts are metal shrink devices which are not supposed to cause any
> > end-user visible change. All the registers are the same, the device
> > signature is the same as for the corresponding non-A device. From a
> > toolchain's point of view, they are completely identical to
> the non-A
> > parts,
>
> You are incorrect.
>
> For example the ATtiny13A now includes registers PRR and
> BODCR, that were not included in the ATtiny13.
>
Note, that this is the reasons why there is now separate support for these two
devices in the toolchain.