[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [avr-libc-dev] New release?
From: |
Weddington, Eric |
Subject: |
RE: [avr-libc-dev] New release? |
Date: |
Thu, 29 Nov 2007 08:15:57 -0700 |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wouter van Gulik [mailto:address@hidden
> Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2007 8:09 AM
> To: Weddington, Eric
> Cc: David Brown; address@hidden
> Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] New release?
>
> > It's a bit late to be discussing these issues, or reworded:
> I wish that
> > discussions like this were done a lot earlier.
> >
> > I'm planning on release WinAVR with GCC 4.2.2. The most
> major issue that
> > I see right now is GCC bug #29524
> > <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29524>
> > I would like to see a patch for this (even if it is not perfect but
> > works) sometime next week.
> >
>
> I tried the code example in the bug report using -lm against
> 4.2.2 and
> it then is around 600 bytes
> Are you aware of this?
Meaning what?
I know that I tested the test case and confirmed that it adds 256 bytes
to RAM.
> I tried fixing this by implementing the __clzm in the
> libgcc.s But I did
> not succeed, because gcc would still use his own. This is probably
> because i missed some config somewhere. But I could not find
> documentation on using the library. Any pointers are well
> come. I might
> give it another try this weekend.
At this point, I would accept a patch that reverts the change back to
the 4.1.x code, while we wait to figure out the best solution that has a
reasonable chance to make it into the repository. I would then just
include that patch in the WinAVR release.
Eric W.
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] New release?, (continued)
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] New release?, Joerg Wunsch, 2007/11/27
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] New release?, Anatoly Sokolov, 2007/11/28
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] New release?, Weddington, Eric, 2007/11/28
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] New release?, Dmitry K., 2007/11/29
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] New release?, David Brown, 2007/11/29
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] New release?, Weddington, Eric, 2007/11/29
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] New release?, David Brown, 2007/11/29
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] New release?, Weddington, Eric, 2007/11/29
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] New release?, Wouter van Gulik, 2007/11/29
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] New release?,
Weddington, Eric <=
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] New release?, Wouter van Gulik, 2007/11/29
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] New release?, Weddington, Eric, 2007/11/29
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] New release?, Dmitry K., 2007/11/30
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] New release?, Weddington, Eric, 2007/11/30