[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [avr-libc-dev] [RFC] Joerg's new vsprint functions.
From: |
E. Weddington |
Subject: |
Re: [avr-libc-dev] [RFC] Joerg's new vsprint functions. |
Date: |
Wed, 19 Nov 2003 16:01:44 -0700 |
On 19 Nov 2003 at 23:28, Joerg Wunsch wrote:
> I'm not sure whether we do want sanity checks at all. After all, this
> is all pilot errors (people forgetting to check whether their buffers
> or FILE * are NULL), but by adding sanity checks, a penalty will be
> imposed on anyone using these functions, including those who used it
> correctly.
>
> Unfortunately, I didn't find any conclusion in the C standard whether
> the behaviour in these situations might be implementation-defined or
> undefined. Maybe ask in comp.lang.c?
Sure, ask a language lawyer.
Eric
- [avr-libc-dev] [RFC] Joerg's new vsprint functions., Theodore A. Roth, 2003/11/18
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] [RFC] Joerg's new vsprint functions., Mike Panetta, 2003/11/18
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] [RFC] Joerg's new vsprint functions., Theodore A. Roth, 2003/11/19
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] [RFC] Joerg's new vsprint functions., Joerg Wunsch, 2003/11/19
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] [RFC] Joerg's new vsprint functions.,
E. Weddington <=
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] [RFC] Joerg's new vsprint functions., Theodore A. Roth, 2003/11/19
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] [RFC] Joerg's new vsprint functions., Joerg Wunsch, 2003/11/20
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] [RFC] Joerg's new vsprint functions., Theodore A. Roth, 2003/11/20