[avr-libc-dev] __vector_N off-by-one?

[Bernd Trog]

Hello,

the avr-libc-1.0/doc/examples/demo/demo.lst looks like this:

[..]
0000004a <__vector_5>:                                                        
                                                         
volatile uint16_t pwm; /* Note [1] */                                         
                                                         
volatile uint8_t direction;                                                   
                                                         
                                                                              
                                                         
SIGNAL (SIG_OVERFLOW1) /* Note [2] */                                         
                                                         
{                                                                             
                                                         
[..]

Could some please explain rational behind __vector_5 and SIG_OVERFLOW1?

According to the 90s2313 data sheet it should be __vector_6.
Yes, the memory address for SIG_OVERFLOW1 is OK :-)




__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Protect your identity with Yahoo! Mail AddressGuard
http://antispam.yahoo.com/whatsnewfree