Re: [avr-libc-dev] speaking of vfprintf...

[E. Weddington]

On 11 Nov 2002 at 22:33, Joerg Wunsch wrote:

> Did anybody have a look at the floating point patch?  Should i just go
> ahead, and commit it?

I'm embarassed to say that I haven't. I don't see why not commit it.
 
> I've got some more ideas...  `star' width/precision (width or
> precision given as arguments to printf()) and %n should be simple,
> too.  This brought me the idea to have a 4th version.  Leave
> vfprintf_min as it is.  See whether there are rarely used things in
> the current vfprintf_std that can be omitted, to make it a bit smaller
> again. Then, have a vfprintf_adv with everything but floating point,
> and finally vfprintf_flt that has all of it.

Do you really want to have 4 versions? IMHO, 3 would be enough to 
choose from, but that's just me. But, as long as you want to code it 
and document it.....

Eric