[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [avr-gcc-list] Re: sprintf
From: |
Weddington, Eric |
Subject: |
RE: [avr-gcc-list] Re: sprintf |
Date: |
Sat, 28 Feb 2009 12:57:01 -0700 |
> -----Original Message-----
> From:
> address@hidden
> [mailto:address@hidden
> org] On Behalf Of David Brown
> Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2009 12:49 PM
> To: address@hidden
> Subject: [avr-gcc-list] Re: sprintf
>
> I didn't mean to imply that there is a problem with sprintf itself -
> I've had occasion to use it in my own programs. The point is
> that it is
> totally inappropriate in this case - not only is direct access to the
> array hugely smaller and faster, but it is very much clearer to write
> and easier to understand.
>
> When you want to use the features of sprintf (and friends)
> for text and
> number formatting, then it is much easier and faster than
> writing your
> own code.
Which can be summed up in the saying: "Use the right tool for the job." ;-)
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Re: sprintf, (continued)
- [avr-gcc-list] Re: sprintf, David Brown, 2009/02/28
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Re: sprintf, David VanHorn, 2009/02/28
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Re: sprintf, David Kelly, 2009/02/27
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Re: sprintf, David VanHorn, 2009/02/27
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Re: sprintf, Daniel O'Connor, 2009/02/27
- [avr-gcc-list] Re: sprintf, David Brown, 2009/02/28
- RE: [avr-gcc-list] Re: sprintf,
Weddington, Eric <=