[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [avr-gcc-list] About context saving in Vectors
From: |
Paulo Marques |
Subject: |
Re: [avr-gcc-list] About context saving in Vectors |
Date: |
Thu, 15 Jan 2009 16:27:51 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20081227) |
Stu Bell wrote:
> Jim Brain wrote:
> [...]
>> Can someone clarify why these macros are preferred over doing
>> cli()/sei()/SREG=sreg in code? I'm not trying to troll, but
>> wonder if there is something I am missing.
> [...]
> More important, in my mind, is that the macros are written in such a way
> that the enclosed code is guaranteed not to be optimized out of the
> block.
This for me is the most important and most surprising point to newbies:
code can be moved out of a cli() / sei() block by compiler optimizations
because sei() is not a compiler barrier at all (just search for a
previous thread '"cli" and "sei" should clobber memory').
> [...nice sum up of atomic_* advantages trimmed...]
--
Paulo Marques
Software Development Department - Grupo PIE, S.A.
Phone: +351 252 290600, Fax: +351 252 290601
Web: www.grupopie.com
"All I ask is a chance to prove that money can't make me happy."
- [avr-gcc-list] About context saving in Vectors, Lin Nan, 2009/01/14
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] About context saving in Vectors, dlc, 2009/01/14
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] About context saving in Vectors, David Kelly, 2009/01/14
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] About context saving in Vectors, dlc, 2009/01/14
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] About context saving in Vectors, David Kelly, 2009/01/14
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] About context saving in Vectors, Preston Wilson, 2009/01/14
Re: [avr-gcc-list] About context saving in Vectors, Dave Hylands, 2009/01/14
Re: [avr-gcc-list] About context saving in Vectors, Dave Hylands, 2009/01/14