[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [avr-gcc-list] Inconsisten behaviour of switch statement
|
From: |
Preston Wilson |
|
Subject: |
Re: [avr-gcc-list] Inconsisten behaviour of switch statement |
|
Date: |
Mon, 26 Mar 2007 06:41:24 -0400 |
|
User-agent: |
Microsoft-Entourage/11.3.3.061214 |
"Schwichtenberg, Knut" <address@hidden> wrote:
> BTW: Is there any reason why the compares within the switch are at least 16
> bit and not type dependent for 8 bit types? If you program this as a normal
> if, 8 bit compares are generated.
The promotion of the controlling expression in the switch statement to an
integer is part of the C standard. I cannot quote sections or lines of text
from the standard, but I know that is the spec'd behavior.
I don't know the answer to the first/real question.
-Preston
- [avr-gcc-list] Inconsisten behaviour of switch statement, Schwichtenberg, Knut, 2007/03/26
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Inconsisten behaviour of switch statement,
Preston Wilson <=
- RE: [avr-gcc-list] Inconsisten behaviour of switch statement, Eric Weddington, 2007/03/26
- RE: [avr-gcc-list] Inconsisten behaviour of switch statement, Schwichtenberg, Knut, 2007/03/26
- RE: [avr-gcc-list] Inconsisten behaviour of switch statement, Eric Weddington, 2007/03/26
- RE: [avr-gcc-list] Inconsisten behaviour of switch statement, Dave Hansen, 2007/03/26
- RE: [avr-gcc-list] Inconsisten behaviour of switch statement, Eric Weddington, 2007/03/26
- RE: [avr-gcc-list] Inconsisten behaviour of switch statement, Paulo Marques, 2007/03/26
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Inconsisten behaviour of switch statement, Joerg Wunsch, 2007/03/27
- RE: [avr-gcc-list] Inconsisten behaviour of switch statement, Schwichtenberg, Knut, 2007/03/27
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Inconsisten behaviour of switch statement, Joerg Wunsch, 2007/03/27
- RE: [avr-gcc-list] Inconsisten behaviour of switch statement, Schwichtenberg, Knut, 2007/03/27