Re: [avr-gcc-list] gcc prolog incorrect?

[Dave Hansen]

From: Jeff Barlow <address@hidden>

> address@hidden  wrote:
>
> >So what happens if we get interrupt between 69 and 70? And that interrupt 
> disables interrupts?
>
> I would claim that an ISR that returns without enabling
> interrupts is _broken_.

Worse than broken.  On the AVR,  it is _impossible_ to return from an 
interrupt (more specifically RETI) without enabling interrupts.

Regards,
  -=Dave