Re: [avr-gcc-list] one-byte stack bug in tiny26

[E. Weddington]

On 28 Apr 2004 at 12:58, Erik Christiansen wrote:

> On Tue, Apr 27, 2004 at 11:51:19AM +0200, Marek Michalkiewicz wrote:
> > Looks like another reason for per-device multilibs, as the avr2/3/4/5
> > device groups are not enough (my fault, it looked clean at the time
> > when Atmel's future plans were top secret - today we know about chips
> > with "movw", but without "mul" = more than avr2, less than avr4).
> > I'm not sure if we really want so many ld emulations though...
> 
> Marek,
> 
>    There has recently been some discussion of multilibbing, over on
> crossgcc. It doesn't seem easy to get working perfectly. Also, this path
> seems to greatly increase your workload.
> 

What's the issue with getting it to "work perfectly"?
I'm also subscribed to crossgcc, but I don't remember this thread, do you have 
a link?