[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [avr-gcc-list] mega48, mega88, mega168 support
|
From: |
E. Weddington |
|
Subject: |
Re: [avr-gcc-list] mega48, mega88, mega168 support |
|
Date: |
Thu, 15 Apr 2004 07:10:12 -0600 |
On 15 Apr 2004 at 9:57, Joerg Wunsch wrote:
> "E. Weddington" <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> > It'll take some time to do this.... Contact me off-list about it.
>
> Btw., since the AVR binary files are independent of the OS and
> architecture of the host OS, wouldn't it be possible to recompile
> avr-libc on Unix, and drop that straight into a Windows box?
Sure, in theory. AFAIK, it's never been tried with going to a Windows box.
> avr-binutils and avr-gcc do have fixed path names compiled into them,
> but as far as I can tell, the plain AVR object files should not suffer
> from this (except for debugging strings, obviously).
... which for testing purposes should be fine.
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] mega48, mega88, mega168 support, (continued)
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] mega48, mega88, mega168 support, Theodore A. Roth, 2004/04/14
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] mega48, mega88, mega168 support, Galen Seitz, 2004/04/14
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] mega48, mega88, mega168 support, Theodore A. Roth, 2004/04/14
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] mega48, mega88, mega168 support, Bob Paddock, 2004/04/14
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] mega48, mega88, mega168 support, Theodore A. Roth, 2004/04/14
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] mega48, mega88, mega168 support, Geir Botterli, 2004/04/14
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] mega48, mega88, mega168 support, E. Weddington, 2004/04/14
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] mega48, mega88, mega168 support, Joerg Wunsch, 2004/04/15
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] mega48, mega88, mega168 support, Alan Kilian, 2004/04/15
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] mega48, mega88, mega168 support, Joerg Wunsch, 2004/04/16
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] mega48, mega88, mega168 support,
E. Weddington <=
Re: [avr-gcc-list] mega48, mega88, mega168 support, E. Weddington, 2004/04/14