[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: AM_MAINTAINER_MODE
From: |
Russ Allbery |
Subject: |
Re: AM_MAINTAINER_MODE |
Date: |
Sat, 09 Feb 2013 12:53:22 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.4 (gnu/linux) |
Bob Proulx <address@hidden> writes:
> But another question to ask is if that is the case why not simply touch
> all of the files to the same time after the patching and before the
> make? That also forces everything to appear up to date too and doesn't
> need AM_MAINTAINER_MODE to be added.
Sure, that also works. It just seems kind of silly to have to deceive
make rather than just removing the make rules that one doesn't want.
--
Russ Allbery (address@hidden) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
- Re: AM_MAINTAINER_MODE, (continued)
- Re: AM_MAINTAINER_MODE, Bob Friesenhahn, 2013/02/07
- Re: AM_MAINTAINER_MODE, Diego Elio Pettenò, 2013/02/07
- Re: AM_MAINTAINER_MODE, Stefano Lattarini, 2013/02/08
- Re: AM_MAINTAINER_MODE, Diego Elio Pettenò, 2013/02/08
- Re: AM_MAINTAINER_MODE, Stefano Lattarini, 2013/02/09
- Re: AM_MAINTAINER_MODE, immanuel litzroth, 2013/02/08
- Re: AM_MAINTAINER_MODE, Russ Allbery, 2013/02/08
- Re: AM_MAINTAINER_MODE, Ineiev, 2013/02/09
- Re: AM_MAINTAINER_MODE, Russ Allbery, 2013/02/09
- Re: AM_MAINTAINER_MODE, Bob Proulx, 2013/02/09
- Re: AM_MAINTAINER_MODE,
Russ Allbery <=
- Re: AM_MAINTAINER_MODE, Bob Friesenhahn, 2013/02/09
- Re: AM_MAINTAINER_MODE, Bob Proulx, 2013/02/09
- Re: AM_MAINTAINER_MODE, immanuel litzroth, 2013/02/08