Re: [RFC] Docs: document silent make rules in a new chapter

[Ralf Wildenhues]

* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 01:00:05PM CET:
> ... I'm fine with this; I'll just rewrite the fixme comment to
> reference the thread above and to be more "possibilist":
> 
>  @c FIXME: Could we find a better name than $(AM_V_at)?  $(AM_V_SILENT)
>  @c is nice, but also a bit too long.
>  @c If we find such a better name, we should then deprecate $(AM_V_at),
>  @c but *not* remove it: it should be kept for backward-compatibility.

Instead, please open a PR by writing to bug-automake, and point to the
cited threads and this one.  debbugs is better than a comment in the
manual.

Thanks,
Ralf