[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Questions on 'make dist'
From: |
NightStrike |
Subject: |
Re: Questions on 'make dist' |
Date: |
Wed, 19 Mar 2008 15:55:55 -0400 |
On 3/19/08, Stepan Kasal <address@hidden> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 03:13:06PM -0400, NightStrike wrote:
> > On 3/19/08, Stepan Kasal <address@hidden> wrote:
> > > BTW: Why do you insist on the layout described above? I would have
> > > one top-level directory and make "doc" and "headers" (or perhaps
> > > "hdr") subdirs.
> >
> > The mingw-w64-headers directory contains headers that are required to
> > use the resulting gcc toolchain. They are not required to build
> > anything under mingw-w64-crt. I think that is why Kai chose to
> > separate them out.
>
> thanks for explanation.
>
> So you can do somethig like:
>
> mingw-w64/crt
> mingw-w64/doc
> mingw-w64/hdr
>
> so that you can easily describe the doc/something and hdr/something
> in the top level makefile, or you just keep this structure and let
> make recurse to all three subdirs.
>
> I do not think you should have more than one configure script, and it
> should be in the top level directory.
So I guess the choices boil down to:
1) Change the directory structure
2) Recursive make to a small degree
Is that about right?
- Questions on 'make dist', NightStrike, 2008/03/10
- Re: Questions on 'make dist', Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/03/11
- Re: Questions on 'make dist', NightStrike, 2008/03/11
- Re: Questions on 'make dist', Bob Friesenhahn, 2008/03/11
- Re: Questions on 'make dist', NightStrike, 2008/03/19
- Re: Questions on 'make dist', Stepan Kasal, 2008/03/19
- Re: Questions on 'make dist', NightStrike, 2008/03/19
- Re: Questions on 'make dist', Stepan Kasal, 2008/03/19
- Re: Questions on 'make dist',
NightStrike <=
- Re: Questions on 'make dist', Stepan Kasal, 2008/03/19
- Re: Questions on 'make dist', Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/03/20
- Re: Questions on 'make dist', NightStrike, 2008/03/19