[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: .o naming seems strange

From: Brian Dessent
Subject: Re: .o naming seems strange
Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2007 12:48:03 -0700

Jan Engelhardt wrote:

>   CC       ccgfs_mount-mount.o     ( mount.o )
>   CC       ccgfs_mount-packet.o    ( packet.o )

Your defines ccgfs_mount_CFLAGS.

>   CC       storage.o               ( ccgfs_storage-storage.o )
>   CC       packet.o                ( ccgfs_storage-packet.o  )

Your doesn't define any ccgfs_storage_*FLAGS.

> I either expected all .o files to have the program prefix, or none at all.
> Hints, as to why this happens? And/or why is mount.o compiled twice -
> there is no libtool involved at all.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]