[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: EXEEXT messing up extension substitutions on win32.
From: |
Tim Van Holder |
Subject: |
Re: EXEEXT messing up extension substitutions on win32. |
Date: |
Thu, 16 Nov 2006 08:55:52 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Windows/20061025) |
Tim Van Holder wrote:
> Given that the "programs" are basically incarnations of a test script
> and not binary executables, would it make sense to use check_SCRIPTS
> instead of check_PROGRAMS?
Ignore this - it's early in the morning, just reread the message to find
the .test files are the scripts, not the check_PROGRAMS.