automake
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: sysconf_DATA v. dist_sysconf_DATA


From: Ralf Wildenhues
Subject: Re: sysconf_DATA v. dist_sysconf_DATA
Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 14:04:20 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-11-01)

* David Everly wrote on Thu, Nov 09, 2006 at 01:52:12PM CET:
> On 11/9/06, Stepan Kasal <address@hidden> wrote:
> >On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 05:46:23PM -0700, David Everly wrote:
> >> I put together a test case before sending my email, the only line in
> >> the one Makefile.am is the one I gave containing test.txt.
> >
> >well, I created configure.ac and Makefile.am:
[...]
> This is almost identical to what I tried.

Thanks for the example.  So this is the same issue as discussed in this
thread: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/automake/2006-09/msg00014.html

> >and the distcheck failed with the expected message:
> >
> >make[1]: *** No rule to make target `../test.txt', needed by `all-am'.  
> >Stop.

Stepan, I don't think you did exactly as you wrote.  You wrote:

> >Then I run:
> >
> >autoreconf -i
> >./configure
> >make distcheck

But I think you used
  ../configure

instead.

> >I used recent CVS build of Autoconf, and a CVS version of Automake
> >which is slightly older than 1.10.
> 
> Ok, so there must be something that is better about CVS because your
> test also does not fail for me.

Nope.

Cheers,
Ralf




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]