[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Disabling optimization
From: |
Andrew Suffield |
Subject: |
Re: Disabling optimization |
Date: |
Thu, 18 Nov 2004 11:56:38 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i |
On Thu, Nov 18, 2004 at 12:41:37PM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-11-18 at 11:55 +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> > Stepan Kasal <address@hidden> writes:
> >
> > > out of curiosity, what would be wrong with the following?
> > >
> > > if test -n "${CXXFLAGS}"; then
> > > CXXFLAGS="-g"
> > > fi
> > > AC_PROG_CXX
> >
> > I think you got it backwards. This makes it impossible to override
> > CXXFLAGS.
>
> Isn't the snippet below sufficient?
> CXXFLAGS=${CXXFLAGS--g}
> AC_PROG_CXX
What you're all trying to say is this:
CXXFLAGS="-g -O0 ${CXXFLAGS}"
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' : http://www.debian.org/ |
`. `' |
`- -><- |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- Disabling optimization, Jonathan, 2004/11/17
- Re: Disabling optimization, Andre Caldas, 2004/11/17
- Re: Disabling optimization, Braden McDaniel, 2004/11/17
- Re: Disabling optimization, Stepan Kasal, 2004/11/18
- Re: Disabling optimization, Andreas Schwab, 2004/11/18
- Re: Disabling optimization, Ralf Corsepius, 2004/11/18
- Re: Disabling optimization,
Andrew Suffield <=
- Re: Disabling optimization, Ralf Corsepius, 2004/11/18
- Re: Disabling optimization, Andrew Suffield, 2004/11/18
- Re: Disabling optimization, Bob Friesenhahn, 2004/11/18
- Re: Disabling optimization, Andrew Suffield, 2004/11/18
- Re: Disabling optimization, Bob Friesenhahn, 2004/11/18
- Re: Disabling optimization, Thomas 'Tom' R. Treadway III, 2004/11/18
- Re: Disabling optimization, Andreas Schwab, 2004/11/18
- Re: Disabling optimization, Bob Proulx, 2004/11/19
- Re: Disabling optimization, Andrew Suffield, 2004/11/19
- Re: Disabling optimization, Thomas Dickey, 2004/11/19