[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: library name enforcement?

From: Dale E Martin
Subject: Re: library name enforcement?
Date: Mon, 3 May 2004 07:18:29 -0400
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.4i

On Sun, May 02, 2004 at 10:52:54PM -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Older versions of automake allowed arbitrary library names.
>   noinst_LIBRARIES = foo.a
> Recent versions of automake now complain about this naming.
> `foo.a' is not a standard library name
> I would normally like the lib naming but in this case I am retrofiting
> an existing project and others disagree.
> I searched the documentation but I could find no way to revert to the
> previous behavior.  Any hints?

Does this work?

Something very close to this works for libtool libraries.  I suppose it
could have other unintended effects, though.

Dale E. Martin, Clifton Labs, Inc.
Senior Computer Engineer
pgp key available

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]