[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
AM_CONDITIONAL not working properly, or I just don't understand :-(
From: |
Kevin P. Fleming |
Subject: |
AM_CONDITIONAL not working properly, or I just don't understand :-( |
Date: |
Sun, 12 Oct 2003 17:46:10 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 |
automake-1.7.8/autoconf-2.57/libtool-1.5
in configure.ac (after all the libtool-related macros but before
AC_OUTPUT):
AM_CONDITIONAL(INSTALL_LIBS, test x$enable_shared = xyes)
in Makefile.am:
...
LIBLIST = src/lib/libnALFS.la
LIBLIST += src/handlers/alfs.la
LIBLIST += src/handlers/build.la
LIBLIST += src/handlers/chroot.la
LIBLIST += src/handlers/configure.la
LIBLIST += src/handlers/copy.la
LIBLIST += src/handlers/execute.la
... (more of the same)
if INSTALL_LIBS
INSTALL_LIBLIST = $(LIBLIST)
else
INSTALL_LIBLIST =
endif
if !INSTALL_LIBS
NOINST_LIBLIST = $(LIBLIST)
else
NOINST_LIBLIST =
endif
pkglib_LTLIBRARIES = $(INSTALL_LIBLIST)
noinst_LTLIBRARIES = $(NOINST_LIBLIST)
With this construction, automake complains "src/handlers/alfs.la is
already going to be installed in 'noinst'" (for each library). All
_SOURCES/_LDFLAGS/etc. variables for these libraries appear after this
set of lines (I have tried them before and after, no difference). I
have tried setting pkglib_LTLIBRARIES and noinst_LTLIBRARIES
_directly_ inside the conditional (instead of using intermediate
variables), but that didn't help.
This is about the fourth attempt at constructing this logic; I need to
_always_ build these libraries, but only install them if the user
asked them to be built shared (for a static build, they will be
subsumed into the main binary and don't need to be installed). Am I
missing something? This seems to be a valid thing to try, but I can't
get automake to accept it.
- AM_CONDITIONAL not working properly, or I just don't understand :-(,
Kevin P. Fleming <=
- Re: AM_CONDITIONAL not working properly, or I just don't understand :-(, Gary V. Vaughan, 2003/10/13
- Re: AM_CONDITIONAL not working properly, or I just don't understand :-(, Kevin P. Fleming, 2003/10/13
- Re: AM_CONDITIONAL not working properly, or I just don't understand :-(, Gary V. Vaughan, 2003/10/15
- Re: AM_CONDITIONAL not working properly, or I just don't understand :-(, Kevin P. Fleming, 2003/10/15
- Re: AM_CONDITIONAL not working properly, or I just don't understand :-(, Gary V. Vaughan, 2003/10/15
- Re: AM_CONDITIONAL not working properly, or I just don't understand :-(, Kevin P. Fleming, 2003/10/15
- Re: AM_CONDITIONAL not working properly, or I just don't understand :-(, Gary V. Vaughan, 2003/10/16
- Re: AM_CONDITIONAL not working properly, or I just don't understand :-(, Kevin P. Fleming, 2003/10/16
- Re: AM_CONDITIONAL not working properly, or I just don't understand :-(, Kevin P. Fleming, 2003/10/17