[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Why is malloc being defined as rpl_malloc ??
From: |
Jim Meyering |
Subject: |
Re: Why is malloc being defined as rpl_malloc ?? |
Date: |
Mon, 05 May 2003 16:36:57 +0200 |
"Dr. David Kirkby" <address@hidden> wrote:
...
> I'm now trying to run the script on a 64-bit Dec Alpha (Digital
> Personal Workstation 600a to be precise) running HP/Compaq's Tru64
> operating system. The build process fails with:
>
> ld:
> Unresolved:
> rpl_malloc
That happens when you use AC_FUNC_MALLOC (and it finds it needs to use
rpl_malloc), and a later configure-time link-test (or run-test) uses
malloc without preceding that use with `#undef malloc'.
Please let us know which macro contains the offending use of malloc.
- Why is malloc being defined as rpl_malloc ??, Dr. David Kirkby, 2003/05/03
- Re: Why is malloc being defined as rpl_malloc ??, Paul Eggert, 2003/05/04
- Re: Why is malloc being defined as rpl_malloc ??, Thomas E. Dickey, 2003/05/04
- Re: Why is malloc being defined as rpl_malloc ??, Dr. David Kirkby, 2003/05/04
- Re: Why is malloc being defined as rpl_malloc ??, Paul Eggert, 2003/05/04
- Re: Why is malloc being defined as rpl_malloc ??, Dr. David Kirkby, 2003/05/05
- Re: Why is malloc being defined as rpl_malloc ??, Paul Eggert, 2003/05/05
- Re: Why is malloc being defined as rpl_malloc ??, Dr. David Kirkby, 2003/05/05
Re: Why is malloc being defined as rpl_malloc ??,
Jim Meyering <=