[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
"Correct" way of implementing common files?
From: |
hugo |
Subject: |
"Correct" way of implementing common files? |
Date: |
Wed, 1 Aug 2001 18:00:38 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.18i |
Hi,
I'm new here... Apologies if this is an FAQ, but I can't find
anything which says it is.
What is the "right" (or best) way of implementing common files? I
have a project with several sub-directories; these subdirs have a
number of source files in common, which should rightly be placed in a
subdir of their own. How do I persuade automake to make the .o files
in the "common" directory, and to link with those files in each of the
other sub-directories?
Thanks,
Hugo.
--
=== Hugo Mills: address@hidden carfax.org.uk | darksatanic.net | lug.org.uk ===
PGP: 1024D/1C335860 from keyservers or www.carfax.nildram.co.uk
---- "We did a risk management review. We concluded that ----
there was no risk of any management."
- "Correct" way of implementing common files?,
hugo <=