[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Testsuite fails
From: |
Tom Tromey |
Subject: |
Re: Testsuite fails |
Date: |
27 Feb 2001 17:40:19 -0700 |
>>>>> "adl" == Alexandre Duret-Lutz <address@hidden> writes:
adl> Is it an "ok" for my proposal or a "no, keep it as it is now"?
adl> Right now, I would have to call AC_CHECK_TOOL([STRIP],[strip])
adl> in my configure.in *before* calling AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE to make
adl> thinks work.
Yeah. I think we should just change AM_PROG_INSTALL_STRIP to always
use install-sh. I don't think it is very important to try to optimize
install-strip.
adl> Basically I'm asking the same thing for strip. Except that
adl> since Autoconf 2.13 doesn't ship with an AC_PROG_STRIP macro
adl> that Automake can check for, this macro would be supplied by
adl> automake (unfortunately).
I don't want to supply it in automake. We're moving out of the macro
business now that autoconf is maintained.
Tom
- Testsuite fails, Pavel Roskin, 2001/02/17
- Re: Testsuite fails, Tom Tromey, 2001/02/18
- Re: Testsuite fails, Pavel Roskin, 2001/02/18
- Re: Testsuite fails, Akim Demaille, 2001/02/19
- Re: Testsuite fails, Derek R. Price, 2001/02/22
- Re: Testsuite fails, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2001/02/25
- Re: Testsuite fails, Tom Tromey, 2001/02/25
- Re: Testsuite fails, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2001/02/26
- Re: Testsuite fails,
Tom Tromey <=
Re: Testsuite fails, Akim Demaille, 2001/02/19
Re: Testsuite fails, Derek R. Price, 2001/02/22