[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Automake maintenance (was: Re: [PATCH v3] new option: object-shortna
From: |
Karl Berry |
Subject: |
Re: Automake maintenance (was: Re: [PATCH v3] new option: object-shortname) |
Date: |
Tue, 3 Jan 2017 22:34:47 GMT |
1. I'm no longer involved with GNU infrastructure work at all. (Write
address@hidden to reach the people doing that stuff now, primarily
Brandon Invergo.) But I will comment anyway.
2. Jim (Meyering) is currently the only active maintainer of Automake.
Given that he is also responsible for numerous other packages, I imagine
he would welcome anyone coming forward.
3. As an Automake user, all I can say is that I dearly, ardently,
fervently, hope changes that will be made, by any maintainer, extremely
cautiously. The long-term stability and compatibility of Automake (and
Autoconf and M4) is, in my opinion, a primary reason why it has
succeeded to the extent it has.
4. I have nothing against requiring GNU make, per se, as long as there's
a decent chance of existing .ac/.am files continuing to work. Looking at
NG-NEWS, I think that is true.
Happy hacking,
Karl