Re: [Automake-commit] [SCM] GNU Automake branch, master, updated. v1.11-1949-gacde270

[Peter Rosin]

Stefano Lattarini skrev 2012-02-16 10:52:
> This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
> generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
> the project "GNU Automake".
> 
> http://git.sv.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=automake.git;a=commitdiff;h=acde2706ea7644f16b2c686ce3c0c8cf95774ff5
> 
> The branch, master has been updated
>        via  acde2706ea7644f16b2c686ce3c0c8cf95774ff5 (commit)
>        via  641a5a4bf09cdc07acf1539caa86f6197feb032e (commit)
>        via  0313d37bd0f5016e85aaea03bb5b1309cf03db19 (commit)
>        via  957b720009f29b248e1c7303bf2d684af75c3a1f (commit)
>        via  db5ddc2bfceeb4470d02c2ff2375cf5900415493 (commit)
>        via  355e607b4d97870e16c470f273c92b7fad14d81c (commit)
>        via  9179b6d0484f7c5535123096fd206dc22019be9b (commit)
>       from  e05e1beda210998a42625662b852f995d5b2e82a (commit)
> 
> Those revisions listed above that are new to this repository have
> not appeared on any other notification email; so we list those
> revisions in full, below.
> 
> - Log -----------------------------------------------------------------

*snip*

> commit 641a5a4bf09cdc07acf1539caa86f6197feb032e
> Author: Stefano Lattarini <address@hidden>
> Date:   Thu Feb 16 10:46:23 2012 +0100
> 
>     maint: run "make update-copyright"
> 

*snip*

> diff --git a/COPYING b/COPYING
> index d511905..a9a3ea0 100644
> --- a/COPYING
> +++ b/COPYING
> @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
>                   GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE
>                      Version 2, June 1991
>  
> - Copyright (C) 1989, 1991 Free Software Foundation, Inc.,
> + Copyright (C) 1989-2012 Free Software Foundation, Inc.,
>   51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA
>   Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim copies
>   of this license document, but changing it is not allowed.

Was this intentional?


> diff --git a/ChangeLog.00 b/ChangeLog.00
> index 756107d..c50c4eb 100644
> --- a/ChangeLog.00
> +++ b/ChangeLog.00
> @@ -2205,7 +2205,7 @@
>  
>  -----
>  
> -Copyright 1999, 2000 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> +Copyright 1999-2012 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
>  
>  Copying and distribution of this file, with or without modification, are
>  permitted provided the copyright notice and this notice are preserved.

This?  The other old ChangeLogs?

*snip*

> diff --git a/lib/ar-lib b/lib/ar-lib
> index c0286a4..c698ac5 100755
> --- a/lib/ar-lib
> +++ b/lib/ar-lib
> @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
>  me=ar-lib
>  scriptversion=2012-01-30.22; # UTC
>  
> -# Copyright (C) 2010, 2012 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> +# Copyright (C) 2010-2012 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
>  # Written by Peter Rosin <address@hidden>.
>  #
>  # This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify

NOOOOOOOO!

You have forked the scripts again!

> diff --git a/lib/compile b/lib/compile
> index b1f4749..e8a13ea 100755
> --- a/lib/compile
> +++ b/lib/compile
> @@ -3,8 +3,7 @@
>  
>  scriptversion=2012-01-04.17; # UTC
>  
> -# Copyright (C) 1999, 2000, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2009, 2010, 2012 Free
> -# Software Foundation, Inc.
> +# Copyright (C) 1999-2012 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
>  # Written by Tom Tromey <address@hidden>.
>  #
>  # This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify

AAARRRGGGHHH!

*snip*

> diff --git a/lib/depcomp b/lib/depcomp
> index 2c30282..089f556 100755
> --- a/lib/depcomp
> +++ b/lib/depcomp
> @@ -3,8 +3,7 @@
>  
>  scriptversion=2012-02-03.15; # UTC
>  
> -# Copyright (C) 1999, 2000, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2009, 2010,
> -# 2011, 2012 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> +# Copyright (C) 1999-2012 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
>  
>  # This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
>  # it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by

Again.  Sigh.

*snip*

These three scripts are the one I care the most about, and they should be
modified on the msvc branch.  Other scripts should be modified on maint.
That is, if we want them to be strictly better across all branches which
I thought we agreed to...

Cheers,
Peter