[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: New auxiliary archive script
From: |
Peter Rosin |
Subject: |
Re: New auxiliary archive script |
Date: |
Fri, 06 Aug 2010 00:00:53 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.7) Gecko/20100713 Thunderbird/3.1.1 |
Hi Ralf,
Den 2010-08-01 20:06 skrev Ralf Wildenhues:
For actual applicability, it is sufficient if you provide a working
script, post testsuite results with it in place (you might want to
MAKE='make AR=...'
When I do
MAKE='make "AR=/path/to/archive lib"' make "AR=/path/to/archive lib" check
I get a whole bunch of failures when tests are running configure, the first
one being aclocal4.test:
...
checking for gcc option to accept ISO C89... none needed
checking for style of include used by make "AR=/path/to/archive lib"... none
checking dependency style of gcc... none
configure: creating ./config.status
config.status: creating Makefile
config.status: creating lib/Makefile
config.status: executing depfiles commands
+ make '"AR=/path/to/archive' 'lib"' check-not-foo
make: *** No rule to make target `lib"'. Stop.
+ exit_status=2
...
I have also tried
MAKE='make AR="/path/to/archive lib"' make AR="/path/to/archive lib" check
MAKE="make 'AR=/path/to/archive lib'" make 'AR=/path/to/archive lib' check
MAKE="make AR='/path/to/archive lib'" make AR='/path/to/archive lib' check
and
MAKE='make "AR=/path/to/archive lib"' make check
but the aclocal4.test configure (et al) bomb out similarly.
So, I need help with feeding $AR with spaces to the test suite.
Cheers,
Peter
- Re: pr-msvc-support merge, Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/08/01
- Re: New auxiliary archive script,
Peter Rosin <=
- Re: New auxiliary archive script, Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/08/06
- Re: New auxiliary archive script, Peter Rosin, 2010/08/06
- cond5.test spurious failure (was: New auxiliary archive script), Stefano Lattarini, 2010/08/06
- Re: cond5.test spurious failure, Peter Rosin, 2010/08/06
- Re: cond5.test spurious failure, Stefano Lattarini, 2010/08/06
- Re: cond5.test spurious failure, Peter Rosin, 2010/08/06
- Re: cond5.test spurious failure, Peter Rosin, 2010/08/06
- Re: cond5.test spurious failure, Stefano Lattarini, 2010/08/06
- Re: cond5.test spurious failure, Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/08/06
- Re: cond5.test spurious failure, Stefano Lattarini, 2010/08/06