Re: [PATCH] eliminate some installation overhead

[Jim Meyering]

Ralf Wildenhues <address@hidden> wrote:
> You just barely beat me!  :-)

Hi Ralf (and welcome back ;-),

...
> A NEWS entry and a couple of tests would be great, but fixing the above
> is needed, too, as well as the nits below.  Note that I'm quite OK with
> reworking this patch myself, if you don't have enough time; but I surely
> would welcome if your motivation keeps you going.  ;-)

If only I'd known!  I would have left it to you ;-)
If you're willing, I'll happily let you do the job.
You can tell I haven't spent much time on it yet,
having deliberately punted on command-line length limits.

I suppose you'd want it to use something like am__nobase_list,
to install them 50 at a time here, too.

Either way is fine with me, as long as it gets fixed pretty soon.

Jim