Re: AM_LIBTOOLFLAGS, maude_LIBTOOLFLAGS, and LIBTOOLFLAGS

[Ralf Wildenhues]

* Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote on Sun, Dec 12, 2004 at 04:48:30PM CET:
> >>> "adl" == Alexandre Duret-Lutz <address@hidden> writes:
> >>> "Ralf" == Ralf Wildenhues <address@hidden> writes:
>  adl> [...]
> 
>  Ralf> So, how about this?  Let's have Automake include $(LIBTOOLFLAGS) in
>  Ralf> their libtool invocation.  The user can then use
>  Ralf> LIBTOOLFLAGS=--silent
>  Ralf> at either configure or make time.  This approach is Automake-centric,
>  Ralf> but other buildtools can do similar.
> 
>  adl> Sounds sensible to me.  People have also asked this to specify
>  adl> --preserve-dup-deps, and --tag=FOO in cases Automake cannot
>  adl> guess it.

The --tag value would not really fit with LIBTOOLFLAGS, as that would be
used for more than one tag (in a package using more than one tag).  YMMV.

>  adl> Let's make it `$(AM_LIBTOOLFLAGS) $(LIBTOOLFLAGS)' with 
>  adl> `$(AM_LIBTOOLFLAGS)' replaced by `libfoo_la_LIBTOOLFLAGS' if it exists.
> 
>  adl> I'm working on this right now.
> 
> Here is my proposal.

Other than the slight nit above, looks good to me.  Thanks for working
on this.

Regards,
Ralf