Re: FYI: Buffered warnings.

[Tom Tromey]

>>>>> "adl" == Alexandre Duret-Lutz <address@hidden> writes:

adl> I'm installing the following patch, which augments Channels.pm
adl> with the capability to buffer messages, and use this to buffer
adl> warnings until AUTOMAKE_OPTIONS has been processed.  This way we
adl> don't have to care.  Warnings can be issued anywhere, they will
adl> be processed when it's ok.

Cool, this makes sense to me.

Do we currently always issue errors in increasing order of line
number?  If not, would it be desirable?  Reading the above reminded me
of this... it seems like buffering would help there.

Tom