[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ansi5.test fix
From: |
Alexandre Duret-Lutz |
Subject: |
Re: ansi5.test fix |
Date: |
24 Mar 2002 19:29:51 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7 |
>>> "Tom" == Tom Tromey <address@hidden> writes:
[...]
adl> I think using
adl> U=_ $MAKE -e
adl> would be better, but I'm wondering if there are some
adl> drawbacks with using -e.
Tom> I don't know.
I've just sent an update of the "Limitations of Make" section of
the Autoconf to a few lists for comments. This include some
paragraphs about `make -e'. I guess someone will react if this
is bad, so I'll wait a few days before committing this patch.
adl> The patch below updates maintainer-check to detect occurrences of
adl> "$MAKE foo=bar" and suggest "foo=bar $MAKE -e".
Tom> This only matters if we have subdirs, right?
I think it also matters for a few other targets, like
install-strip. Any target that calls $(MAKE).
Tom> Anyway, I don't have a real problem with this.
Tom> It might be more reliable to simply sed `U = _' into the Makefiles.
Tom> But I'm not too concerned about it.
I'll do this if s.o. says `make -e' is bad. Otherwise I'm quite
happy to put a few `make -e' in the testsuite, until someone
complain so we learn the conditions under which `make -e' is not
reliable.
--
Alexandre Duret-Lutz