autoconf
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: new snapshot available: autoconf-2.72c


From: Frederic Berat
Subject: Re: new snapshot available: autoconf-2.72c
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2023 19:21:33 +0200

Hi,

I'm done walking through the Fedora rebuilds, I get the following failures
due to largefile.m4 which breaks with autoconf:

ImageMagick 1:7.1.1.4
emacs 1:28.2
grub2 2.06
gzip 1.12
libidn 1.41
libloc 0.9.16
make 4.4
parted 3.5
pspp 1.6.2
rcs 5.10.1

Indirectly: 'fatresize' (1.1.0) has a bug in its configuration file, which
leads to a build failure with largefile support enabled.

Besides that, I didn't see anything critical.

On top of that, few failures due to malformed configuration files (some
being already fixed upstream): krb5, am-utils

I need to have a closer look at 'kguitar', but there is likely a problem in
the configure.in file too:
./configure: line 27629: syntax error near unexpected token `fi'
./configure: line 27629: `fi'

Fred.

On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 4:23 PM Richard Purdie <
richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:

> I was able to work around the EGREP_TRADITIONAL issue by reordering
> macros. The issue is conditional code blocks which mean
> EGREP_TRADITIONAL was not set in some configure option combinations
> leading to obtuse failures.
>
> Our testing so far shows the following three sets of issues.
>
>
> Macro ordering issues with EGREP_TRADITIONAL being unset:
>
> apr 1.7.2
> libarchive 3.6.2
>
>
> Ship with an older gnulib largefile.m4 which breaks with autoconf
> 2.72c:
>
> parted 3.5
> man-db 2.11.2
> libpipeline 1.5.7
> gzip 1.12
> findutils 4.9.0
> bison 3.8.2
> gettext 0.21.1
> coreutils 9.1
> wget 1.21.3
>
> On x32 were seeing two recipes which configure "ok" but fail at compile
> time:
>
> gpgme 1.18.0
> mpg123 1.31.2
>
>
> https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/57/builds/6771/steps/11/logs/stdio
>
>
> Now that things are roughly building, we should get some better
> automated runtime testing results in a few hours.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Richard
>
>


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]