[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
How can Autoconf help with the transition to stricter compilation defaul
How can Autoconf help with the transition to stricter compilation defaults?
Thu, 10 Nov 2022 12:16:20 -0500
I’m the closest thing Autoconf has to a lead maintainer at present.
It’s come to my attention (via https://lwn.net/Articles/913505/ and
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/PortingToModernC) that GCC and
Clang both plan to disable several “legacy” C language features by
default in a near-future release (GCC 14, Clang 16) (see the Fedora
wiki link for a list). I understand that this change potentially
breaks a lot of old dusty code, and in particular that
Autoconf-generated configure scripts use constructs that may *silently
give the wrong answer to a probe* when a stricter compiler is in use.
Nobody has a whole lot of time to work on Autoconf at present, but I
would like to ask, anyway, what Autoconf could potentially do to make
this transition easier. I’m already aware that the test code Autoconf
2.71 uses to probe for C89/C99/C11 support is broken; this has been
fixed in development trunk to the extent it is possible for me to test
it with GCC 12 (commit:
Several other places using K&R function definitions and/or
unprototyped function declarations (including the ubiquitously used
AC_CHECK_FUNC) have also been fixed on trunk,
Changes to handle C23 built-in ‘bool’ better are under development but
the design has not yet been finalized.
The biggest remaining (potential) problem, that I’m aware of, is that
AC_CHECK_FUNC unconditionally declares the function we’re probing for
as ‘char NAME (void)’, and asks the compiler to call it with no
arguments, regardless of what its prototype actually is. It is not
clear to me whether this will still work with the planned changes to
the compilers. Both GCC 12 and Clang 14 have on-by-default warnings
triggered by ‘extern char memcpy(void);’ (or any other standard
library function whose prototype is coded into the compiler) and this
already causes problems for people who run configure scripts with
CC='cc -Werror'. Unfortunately this is very hard to fix — we would
have to build a comprehensive list of library functions into Autoconf,
mapping each to either its documented prototype or to a header where
it ought to be declared; in the latter case we would also have to make
e.g. AC_CHECK_FUNCS([getaddrinfo]) imply AC_CHECK_HEADERS([sys/types.h
sys/socket.h netdb.h]) which might mess up configure scripts that
aren’t expecting headers to be probed at that point.
How important do you think it is for this to be fixed?
Are there any other changes you would like to see in a near-future
Autoconf 2.72 in order to make this transition easier?
p.s. GCC and Clang folks: As long as you’re changing the defaults out
from under people, can you please also remove the last few predefined
user-namespace macros (-Dlinux, -Dunix, -Darm, etc) from all the