[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: automake problem with multiple "-rpath"
From: |
aotto |
Subject: |
Re: automake problem with multiple "-rpath" |
Date: |
Mon, 10 May 2021 19:14:08 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.0 |
On 10.05.21 15:10, Thomas Jahns wrote:
Hi,
you are confusing the -rpath /some/path option to libtool, which tells
libtool where a library will be installed and the
-Wl,-rpath,/some/other/path option to ld. If you replaced -rpath
.../lib by -Wl,-rpath,.../lib everything should work as expected. Also
relative rpath values will probably not work as expected unless the
library and executabl in question are from one package. Also these are
options to be used by whoever packages/installs the software and thus
have no place in Makefile.am verbatim but rather should be added to
LDFLAGS or similar during configure.
Regards, Thomas
To be honest I don't want to set the -rpath at all…
what I have :
#1 libtclreadline.so depend on libreadline.so
#2 everything is in the SAME directory
#3 the directory is already KNOWN to ld.so
> ls -ald *readline*
-rw-r--r-- 1 dev1usr users 478680 29. Apr 22:28 libreadline.a
lrwxrwxrwx 1 dev1usr users 18 29. Apr 22:28 libreadline.so ->
libreadline.so.4.0
lrwxrwxrwx 1 dev1usr users 18 29. Apr 22:28 libreadline.so.4 ->
libreadline.so.4.0
-rw-r--r-- 1 dev1usr users 432556 29. Apr 22:28 libreadline.so.4.0
-rwxr-xr-x 1 dev1usr users 67656 10. Mai 18:55 libtclreadline-3.0.0.so
-rwxr-xr-x 1 dev1usr users 1109 10. Mai 18:55 libtclreadline.la
lrwxrwxrwx 1 dev1usr users 23 10. Mai 18:55 libtclreadline.so ->
libtclreadline-3.0.0.so
------------------------------------------
important :
libtclreadline.so -> libtclreadline-3.0.0.so and
libreadline.so -> libreadline.so.4.0
error:
libreadline.so.4.0 not found
--------------------------------------------
The EXE dlopen "libtclreadline" and the FIRST soft-link to
"libtclreadline-3.0.0.so" is resolved and
"libtclreadline-3.0.0.so" is dlopend'd, but the "libtclreadline.so"
depend on "libreadline.so" this
is a link to "libreadline.so.4.0"
---------------------------------------------
summary
EXE->dlopen path/to/libtclreadline.so -> symlink to
libtclreadline-3.0.0.so -> depend on libreadline.so
-> symlink libreadline.so.4.0 FAIL
everything is in the SAME directory and the directory is KNOWN because
FIRST symlink as absolute path
-> I spend now near ONE workday to just dlopen a stupid file !!
I prefer a solution with no LD_LIBRARY_PATH and no -rpath at all because
the directory is KNOWN to the
linker and only the "stupid" programming of "ld.so" making things bad.
mfg