[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [patch] Extend AC_PROG_CXX to check for standards conformance
From: |
Paul Eggert |
Subject: |
Re: [patch] Extend AC_PROG_CXX to check for standards conformance |
Date: |
Sun, 20 Jan 2013 22:47:05 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130106 Thunderbird/17.0.2 |
Thanks for doing that.
I don't use C++, so I'm not the best person to review this patch.
But from a quick look I can see one thing missing: the documentation
needs updating.
One other thing:
On 01/20/2013 01:27 PM, Roger Leigh wrote:
> it's useful to restrict the compiler to a minimum standard
> so that you can
> - prevent the use of features you don't want to use
> - ensure that the features you do want are present
In practice, for C at least, almost nobody wants the
former, and Autoconf already does the latter, so it's
good enough.
- [patch] Extend AC_PROG_CXX to check for standards conformance, Roger Leigh, 2013/01/20
- Re: [patch] Extend AC_PROG_CXX to check for standards conformance,
Paul Eggert <=
- Re: [patch] Extend AC_PROG_CXX to check for standards conformance, Roger Leigh, 2013/01/21
- Re: [patch] Extend AC_PROG_CXX to check for standards conformance, Paul Eggert, 2013/01/21
- Re: [patch] Extend AC_PROG_CXX to check for standards conformance, Roger Leigh, 2013/01/21
- Re: [patch] Extend AC_PROG_CXX to check for standards conformance, Miles Bader, 2013/01/21
- Re: [patch] Extend AC_PROG_CXX to check for standards conformance, Paul Eggert, 2013/01/22
- Re: [patch] Extend AC_PROG_CXX to check for standards conformance, Roger Leigh, 2013/01/22
- Re: [patch] Extend AC_PROG_CXX to check for standards conformance, Roger Leigh, 2013/01/28
- Re: [patch] Extend AC_PROG_CXX to check for standards conformance, Paul Eggert, 2013/01/29
Re: [patch] Extend AC_PROG_CXX to check for standards conformance, Roger Leigh, 2013/01/21