Re: Selecting a C++ standard

[Adrian Bunk]

On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 08:08:13PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Adrian Bunk <address@hidden> writes:
> > On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 06:45:01PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> 
> >> Almost none of the software that I work on requires a 64-bit integer type.
> >> (C89 or later is also my default target for the software I write.)
> 
> > I just tried to build remctl and lbcd with CC="gcc -pedantic-errors",
> > and both failed due to them not being pure C89 (some errors are at the
> > bottom of this email).
> 
> Which version of remctl was this?  The trailing comma in enums was a bug,
> but it was already fixed in both 3.3 and in the current master.  I checked
> just now with that flag, and remctl builds apart from the string length
> issue (once one undoes Autoconf's detection of C99 variadic macro
> support).
>...

That was 3.2 from Debian unstable.

cu
Adrian

BTW: Please Cc me on replies.

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed