[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Convensions for NO_<feature> instead of HAVE_<feature>?
|
From: |
Harlan Stenn |
|
Subject: |
Re: Convensions for NO_<feature> instead of HAVE_<feature>? |
|
Date: |
Mon, 07 Nov 2011 22:35:56 -0800 |
I have also used WANT_FEATURE and NEED_FEATURE sometimes.
If the app sets WANT_FEATURE and configure says is it there already, we
do not define NEED_FEATURE. If configure says it is not there, we
define NEED_FEATURE and then in this case we provide the feature.
H