Re: porting with autotools

[Reuben Hawkins]

On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 1:57 PM, Reuben Hawkins <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 9:40 PM, NightStrike <address@hidden> wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 3:09 PM, Ralf Wildenhues <address@hidden> wrote:
>>> Hello Reuben,
>>>
>>> * Reuben Hawkins wrote on Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 06:00:02PM CEST:
>>>> > Now, if you are still interested in contributing, and maybe in perl
>>>> > rather than C, then I will send you the details off-list.
>>>
>>>> Yes, I'm interested in contributing, but not in Perl.  It'll have to
>>>> be C code.  I'll check back with you in a few weeks when I feel the
>>>> code is ready.
>>>
>>> Adding tool in a compiled language for this purpose doesn't make a lot
>>> of sense for Autotools; it would needlessly complicate things, and
>>> probably make the code size a lot bigger.  If you don't want to
>>> reconsider this, we can still profit from your prototype implementation
>>> by looking at it and translating it (though I don't think I've ever
>>> translated from C to Perl before ;-)
>>>
>>> But maybe one of the other maintainers likes this idea better ...
>>
>> UML.....
>>
>
> So it seem to be working.  amgen now scans the source and headers it
> finds to come up with a reasonable include path.  Anyone interested
> can get the source here...
>
> git://gitorious.org/amgen/amgen.git
>
> The only thing I left out was to recursively scan the included headers
> to flesh out the include path (maybe I'll get to that sometime).
>

I guess I should add I haven't run it through valgrind lately, but I
plan to later..so there may be some leaks.