[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: determining 32 v. 64 bit compilatio
From: |
Mike Frysinger |
Subject: |
Re: determining 32 v. 64 bit compilatio |
Date: |
Tue, 29 Jun 2010 15:39:24 -0400 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.13.1 (Linux/2.6.34; KDE/4.4.4; x86_64; ; ) |
On Tuesday, June 29, 2010 14:26:29 Wesley Smith wrote:
> What's the appropriate way to determine 32 v. 64 bit compilation?
what exactly is it you're concerned with ? if it's sizes of specific types,
then do as Bob said and check individual types. you cannot make assumptions
when the target is "64bits" or "32bits" because not everyone does a 64bit port
the same. case in point is the Windows 64bit port. it does not define type
sizes the way most people (like Linux 64bit) do.
> I've looked into using:
>
> AC_CANONICAL_BUILD
i also think you're confusing BUILD and HOST. BUILD is where things are
compiled while HOST is where things execute. the vast majority of the time,
HOST is what you want.
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
- determining 32 v. 64 bit compilatio, Wesley Smith, 2010/06/29
- Re: determining 32 v. 64 bit compilatio, Bob Friesenhahn, 2010/06/29
- Re: determining 32 v. 64 bit compilatio,
Mike Frysinger <=
- Re: determining 32 v. 64 bit compilatio, Wesley Smith, 2010/06/29
- Re: determining 32 v. 64 bit compilatio, Mike Frysinger, 2010/06/29
- Re: determining 32 v. 64 bit compilatio, Wesley Smith, 2010/06/29
- Re: determining 32 v. 64 bit compilatio, Raphael 'kena' Poss, 2010/06/29
- Re: determining 32 v. 64 bit compilatio, Wesley Smith, 2010/06/30
- Re: determining 32 v. 64 bit compilatio, Andrew W. Nosenko, 2010/06/30
- Re: determining 32 v. 64 bit compilatio, John Calcote, 2010/06/30
- Re: determining 32 v. 64 bit compilatio, Wesley Smith, 2010/06/30
- Re: determining 32 v. 64 bit compilatio, Peter O'Gorman, 2010/06/30
- Re: determining 32 v. 64 bit compilatio, Bob Friesenhahn, 2010/06/29