[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [CFT] Shell functionization patch (if you don't know what that means
|
From: |
Tom Browder |
|
Subject: |
Re: [CFT] Shell functionization patch (if you don't know what that means, it's faster Autoconf and leaner configure scripts) |
|
Date: |
Thu, 30 Oct 2008 03:53:18 -0500 |
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 8:25 AM, Bob Friesenhahn
<address@hidden> wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Oct 2008, Tom Browder wrote:
...
> Nothing prevents a configure script (written in sh) from using scraps of
> Perl. Hopefully the script would check that Perl exists before actually
> using it.
But is there a clean way without having to watch the m4 special
characters, etc., i.e., some kind of escape so we can change to Perl,
or ruby, or...?
Do you know anything about the $PERL thing Paolo mentioned?
-Tom
- Re: [CFT] Shell functionization patch (if you don't know what that means, it's faster Autoconf and leaner configure scripts), Tom Browder, 2008/10/26
- Re: [CFT] Shell functionization patch (if you don't know what that means, it's faster Autoconf and leaner configure scripts), Eric Blake, 2008/10/27
- Re: [CFT] Shell functionization patch (if you don't know what that means, it's faster Autoconf and leaner configure scripts), Bob Friesenhahn, 2008/10/27
- Re: [CFT] Shell functionization patch (if you don't know what that means, it's faster Autoconf and leaner configure scripts), Bob Friesenhahn, 2008/10/29
- Re: [CFT] Shell functionization patch (if you don't know what that means, it's faster Autoconf and leaner configure scripts),
Tom Browder <=
- Re: [CFT] Shell functionization patch (if you don't know what that means, it's faster Autoconf and leaner configure scripts), Paolo Bonzini, 2008/10/30
Re: [CFT] Shell functionization patch (if you don't know what that means, it's faster Autoconf and leaner configure scripts), Tom Browder, 2008/10/29