[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: AC_TYPE_SIGNAL obsolete?
From: |
Bob Friesenhahn |
Subject: |
Re: AC_TYPE_SIGNAL obsolete? |
Date: |
Sat, 7 Jun 2008 11:21:31 -0500 (CDT) |
On Sat, 7 Jun 2008, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
definitely will. For example, if I was the maintainer of xntp, or a Unix
shell, I would definitely remain concerned about this issue. My package is
only an image processing package, yet several advertized porting targets
(which I still test on) are impacted by this issue.
I will retract this statement. I just checked each of my current
porting targets and they all seem to return the 'void' type from
signal handlers. This includes several systems released in 1997.
Bob
======================================
Bob Friesenhahn
address@hidden, http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/
GraphicsMagick Maintainer, http://www.GraphicsMagick.org/
- AC_TYPE_SIGNAL obsolete?, Eric Blake, 2008/06/06
- Re: AC_TYPE_SIGNAL obsolete?, Bob Friesenhahn, 2008/06/06
- Re: AC_TYPE_SIGNAL obsolete?, Eric Blake, 2008/06/06
- Re: AC_TYPE_SIGNAL obsolete?, Eric Blake, 2008/06/07
- Re: AC_TYPE_SIGNAL obsolete?, Bob Friesenhahn, 2008/06/07
- Re: AC_TYPE_SIGNAL obsolete?, Eric Blake, 2008/06/09
- Re: AC_TYPE_SIGNAL obsolete?, Paul Eggert, 2008/06/09
- Re: AC_TYPE_SIGNAL obsolete?, Harlan Stenn, 2008/06/09
- Re: AC_TYPE_SIGNAL obsolete?, Eric Blake, 2008/06/09
- Re: AC_TYPE_SIGNAL obsolete?, Bob Friesenhahn, 2008/06/09
- Re: AC_TYPE_SIGNAL obsolete?, Paul Eggert, 2008/06/10
- Re: AC_TYPE_SIGNAL obsolete?, Tim Post, 2008/06/10