[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: autotest appropriated ?
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
Re: autotest appropriated ? |
Date: |
Mon, 11 Sep 2006 15:48:37 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-09-01) |
Hello Thomas,
* Thomas Porschberg wrote on Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 10:22:52AM CEST:
>
> I have to establish a test system on Unix/Linux systems
> which has to run/test Java, PLSQL, C/C++ and Shell programs.
> Actually it should be able to run a complete test on a (sub)project.
> Is autotest a suitable tool for that task or is there something other
> out there more appropriate ?
Autotest seems the most appropriate if you have many small, independent
tests. There are quite a few other testsuite tools out there, but for
lack of experience I would not know which ones to suggest. (DejaGNU
seems quite powerful, for example; the Automake TESTS variable together
with some shell scripts seems the most simplistic.)
> PS.: Are there any examples as introduction available ?
This should provide some: http://www.google.de/search?q=testsuite.at
Otherwise, you could look at the following packages:
Autoconf itself, Libtool (CVS version), M4 (CVS version), bison, tar,
monotone, tidy, ..., earlier answers to this question in this list's
archives:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/cgi-bin/namazu.cgi?query=autotest&submit=Search%21&idxname=autoconf
Cheers,
Ralf