[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: m4_wrap behavior
From: |
Paul Eggert |
Subject: |
Re: m4_wrap behavior |
Date: |
Tue, 13 Jun 2006 10:08:24 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) |
My kneejerk suggestion is to implement m4wrap as POSIX requires, but
to add another primitive (m4parw? :-) that works the way 1.4.4 m4wrap
does. We can then ask people who prefer things the old-fashioned way
to use m4parw.
I'd rather not have the behavior depend on POSIXLY_CORRECT.
POSIXLY_CORRECT is a pain to use selectively.
- m4_wrap behavior, Eric Blake, 2006/06/13
- Re: m4_wrap behavior,
Paul Eggert <=
- Re: m4_wrap behavior, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/06/13
- Re: m4_wrap behavior, Stepan Kasal, 2006/06/13
- Re: m4_wrap behavior, Eric Blake, 2006/06/13
- Re: m4_wrap behavior, Stepan Kasal, 2006/06/14
- Re: m4_wrap behavior, Paul Eggert, 2006/06/15
- Re: m4_wrap behavior, Eric Blake, 2006/06/15
- Re: m4_wrap behavior, Stepan Kasal, 2006/06/15
- Re: m4_wrap behavior, Paul Eggert, 2006/06/15
- Re: m4_wrap behavior, Stepan Kasal, 2006/06/15
- Re: m4_wrap behavior, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/06/14