[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: expected Autoconf 2.59 <-> 2.60 compatibility?
From: |
Ben Pfaff |
Subject: |
Re: expected Autoconf 2.59 <-> 2.60 compatibility? |
Date: |
Sun, 14 May 2006 09:05:47 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) |
Paul Eggert <address@hidden> writes:
> Ben Pfaff <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> I've done this now. I actually generated it from the CVS tree,
>> for what it's worth.
>
> Thanks. Where can we get it from? I just now checked
> <http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?searchon=names&version=all&keywords=autoconf>
> and the latest I found was 2.59a-9.
I don't know how often packages.debian.org refreshes its
listings. But the package itself should be available from many
Debian mirrors by now, for example
ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/a/autoconf/
The version number is "2.59.cvs.2006.05.13".
--
On Perl: "It's as if H.P. Lovecraft, returned from the dead and speaking by
seance to Larry Wall, designed a language both elegant and terrifying for his
Elder Things to write programs in, and forgot that the Shoggoths didn't turn
out quite so well in the long run." --Matt Olson
- expected Autoconf 2.59 <-> 2.60 compatibility?, Ben Pfaff, 2006/05/09
- Re: expected Autoconf 2.59 <-> 2.60 compatibility?, Noah Misch, 2006/05/09
- Re: expected Autoconf 2.59 <-> 2.60 compatibility?, Ben Pfaff, 2006/05/09
- Re: expected Autoconf 2.59 <-> 2.60 compatibility?, Ben Pfaff, 2006/05/09
- Re: expected Autoconf 2.59 <-> 2.60 compatibility?, Eric Blake, 2006/05/10
- Re: expected Autoconf 2.59 <-> 2.60 compatibility?, Paul Eggert, 2006/05/10
- Re: expected Autoconf 2.59 <-> 2.60 compatibility?, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/05/10
- Re: expected Autoconf 2.59 <-> 2.60 compatibility?, Ben Pfaff, 2006/05/10
- Re: expected Autoconf 2.59 <-> 2.60 compatibility?, Ben Pfaff, 2006/05/13
- Re: expected Autoconf 2.59 <-> 2.60 compatibility?, Paul Eggert, 2006/05/14
- Re: expected Autoconf 2.59 <-> 2.60 compatibility?,
Ben Pfaff <=
Re: expected Autoconf 2.59 <-> 2.60 compatibility?, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/05/10