autoconf
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Changing PACKAGE_BUGREPORT?


From: Ralf Wildenhues
Subject: Re: Changing PACKAGE_BUGREPORT?
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 09:15:13 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.9i

* Bob Proulx wrote on Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 07:23:50AM CEST:
> Stepan Kasal wrote:
> 
> > Let me give an example: how would you feel if Fedora modifies the package
> > so that it tells the users to report to bugzilla.redhat.com?
> > ...
> > Sure such a step of Fedora would induce negative feelings.
> 
> It depends on how it is handled.  On Debian systems if you run
> "reportbug coreutils" for example it would send the bug report to the
> Debian bug tracking system.  One of the jobs of the maintainer is to
> forward bugs as appropriate upstream.  This sending of bug reports
> into the Debian BTS has not induced any negative feelings that I can
> determine.  I think most distros have their own bug tracking.

Not every distro forwards bug reports upstream smoothly.
I've been frustrated by that.

> I think one of the important points in the discussion not yet
> mentioned is that free software is built by people who volunteer their
> time.

Yes.  Forwarding a bug report to, say, the Cygwin maintainer of a
package, is easy.  Subscribing to several distribution specific bug
tracking systems in order to catch bugs is much more work.  But maybe
everyone else doesn't have this problem.

Cheers,
Ralf




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]