[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [OT] reply-to (was: AC_FOREACH public?)
|
From: |
Andreas Schwab |
|
Subject: |
Re: [OT] reply-to (was: AC_FOREACH public?) |
|
Date: |
Mon, 24 Oct 2005 17:25:23 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Keith MARSHALL <address@hidden> writes:
> Great. You still have that choice, even if the "Reply-to" header points
> back to the list:
>
> . Reply to the address in the "Reply-to" header, for a list reply;
This is an open list. You'll remove anyone from the thread who is not
subscribed to the list.
> . Reply to the address in the "From" header, for a private response;
If Reply-to is present, it replaces the From address for replies (RFC
2822).
> . Reply-to-All, to spam the world...
Keep the non-subscribers in the loop.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, address@hidden
SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."