[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [RFC] Additional targets for powerpc
From: |
Steve Munroe |
Subject: |
Re: [RFC] Additional targets for powerpc |
Date: |
Fri, 23 Sep 2005 08:39:36 -0500 |
Kumar Gala <address@hidden> wrote on 09/23/2005 12:20:06 AM:
> Steve,
>
> Let's make sure not to over look the embedded and 32-bit processors.
> There are a number of variants here that include some user ISA
> extensions that you did not mention:
>
> 4xx MAC
> Book-E isel
> e500 embedded fp
> e500 SPE
>
> Are ones that come of the top of my head. Additionally, I would say
> that Freescale has at least six different powerpc micro-architectures
> that it ships today:
> 8xx, 603, 7400, 745x, e500, e200, (e700 in design)
>
> Also, we have optimized some libc functions for 745x that take
> advantage of altivec and e500 that take advantage of SPE.
>
> Anyways my point is lets make sure that any discussion includes ALL
> of powerpc, not just the ones shipping from IBM :)
>
> - kumar
My proposal is focused on current PowerPC64 compliant processors and the
ISA supported in 32-/64-bit mode. This is important because 64-bit PowerPC
implementation have an expanded instruction set for 32-bit mode. I think I
have my hands full with that project.
If you have a Freescale implementations of the PowerPC64 Archecture I
would like to hear more.
You can propose additional targets for specific PowerPC32 processor
targets. Also e500 etc. is not PowerPC architecture complient and requires
a different ABI and a separate port in GLIBC. e500 is not covery by this
proposal.
Steven J. Munroe
Linux on Power Toolchain Architect
IBM Corporation, Linux Technology Center
- Re: [RFC] Additional targets for powerpc, (continued)
Re: [RFC] Additional targets for powerpc, Paul Brook, 2005/09/22
Re: [RFC] Additional targets for powerpc, Kumar Gala, 2005/09/23
- Re: [RFC] Additional targets for powerpc,
Steve Munroe <=