[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: optional features and AC_ARG_WITH
From: |
Gregorio Guidi |
Subject: |
Re: optional features and AC_ARG_WITH |
Date: |
Thu, 17 Feb 2005 11:28:08 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.7.2 |
On Wednesday 16 February 2005 16:31, you wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 06:05:12PM +0100, Gregorio Guidi wrote:
> > Note: as you can see, the patch assumes there will be a solution for the
> > "AC_REQUIRE in shell conditional" issue.
>
> actually, I believe that both my proposals will get actually implemented.
> But the AS_IF solution is already checked in to the autoconf CVS.
If there will be another solution, I would prefer to avoid AS_IF. After all,
an example is meant to be a way to demonstate how easy it is to do something,
and using another macro can only scare away people that are already
intimidated by autoconf :)
- Re: optional features and AC_ARG_WITH, (continued)
- Re: optional features and AC_ARG_WITH, Braden McDaniel, 2005/02/03
- Re: optional features and AC_ARG_WITH, Dan Manthey, 2005/02/03
- Re: optional features and AC_ARG_WITH, Paul Eggert, 2005/02/04
- Re: optional features and AC_ARG_WITH, Gregorio Guidi, 2005/02/04
- Re: optional features and AC_ARG_WITH, Stepan Kasal, 2005/02/04
- Re: optional features and AC_ARG_WITH, Paul Eggert, 2005/02/04
- Re: optional features and AC_ARG_WITH, Gregorio Guidi, 2005/02/04
- Re: optional features and AC_ARG_WITH, Paul Eggert, 2005/02/04
- Re: optional features and AC_ARG_WITH, Stepan Kasal, 2005/02/09
- Re: optional features and AC_ARG_WITH, Gregorio Guidi, 2005/02/15
- Message not available
- Re: optional features and AC_ARG_WITH,
Gregorio Guidi <=
- Re: optional features and AC_ARG_WITH, Stepan Kasal, 2005/02/18
- Re: optional features and AC_ARG_WITH, Gregorio Guidi, 2005/02/19