[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: AC_PROG_CC_C99
|
From: |
Paul Eggert |
|
Subject: |
Re: AC_PROG_CC_C99 |
|
Date: |
Thu, 02 Dec 2004 10:54:36 -0800 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) |
"Kevin P. Fleming" <address@hidden> writes:
> The risk would certainly be there for people who enable -Werror (or
> the equivalent for non-gcc compilers) early in their configure script
> as part of their "maintainer mode" (like I do).
Can you test Autoconf with 'gcc -std=c99 -pedantic-errors -Werror'?
That might catch some of the problems we're worried about.
- AC_PROG_CC_C99, Roger Leigh, 2004/12/01
- Re: AC_PROG_CC_C99, Ralf Wildenhues, 2004/12/01
- Re: AC_PROG_CC_C99, Bob Friesenhahn, 2004/12/01
- Re: AC_PROG_CC_C99, Steven G. Johnson, 2004/12/01
- Re: AC_PROG_CC_C99, Paul Eggert, 2004/12/01
- Re: AC_PROG_CC_C99, Roger Leigh, 2004/12/01
- Re: AC_PROG_CC_C99, Ralf Wildenhues, 2004/12/02
- Re: AC_PROG_CC_C99, Kevin P. Fleming, 2004/12/02
- Re: AC_PROG_CC_C99,
Paul Eggert <=
- Re: AC_PROG_CC_C99, Kevin P. Fleming, 2004/12/02
- Re: AC_PROG_CC_C99, Bob Friesenhahn, 2004/12/02
- Re: AC_PROG_CC_C99, Paul Eggert, 2004/12/02
- Re: AC_PROG_CC_C99, Bob Friesenhahn, 2004/12/02
- Re: AC_PROG_CC_C99, Akim Demaille, 2004/12/02
- Re: AC_PROG_CC_C99, Noah Misch, 2004/12/02
- Re: AC_PROG_CC_C99, Paul Eggert, 2004/12/02
- Re: AC_PROG_CC_C99, Paul Eggert, 2004/12/02
Re: AC_PROG_CC_C99, Steven G. Johnson, 2004/12/01